11/21/2023 0 Comments Bochs android windows![]() ![]() Bottom line is that programmers want to get paid to do what they love and I question your morals in you having a problem doing with what he wants with his code. Bximage is an easy to use console based tool for creating, converting and resizing disk images, particularly for use with Bochs. That’s just your ideology hoping that model would have worked out for him. If Kevin had fully embraced the community and his projects for their own sake, and followed the now-classic “Paid Support, Paid new features” avenue, it seems he might be a big success? Legally, yes it would seem he would need all copyright assignment or agreement from all contributors. What exactly wrong with MIT again? It’s more free than LGPL. Yeah, as copyright holder he can do that and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I don’t know about “the community”, but I think you’re wrong. What does the OSNews community think of this approach? Or are my impressions all wrong? If Kevin had fully embraced the community and his projects for their own sake, and followed the now-classic “Paid Support, Paid new features” avenue, it seems he might be a big success? If you are having issues with Windows Subsystem for Android please file feedback via Feedback Hub under Apps > Windows Subsystem for Android. Seven months (and no released plex development) later, he starts asking for donations on Sourceforge, having failed in gaining commercial funding: Bochs (pronunciado 'box') es un emulador de código abierto para PC escrito en C++ por Kevin Lawton. The legality of that is pretty questionable unless he got formal copyright transfers from all contributors, and ethically it is even more questionable if outsiders spent hours of their lives tracking bugs and improvements with the implicit assumption that it was for a community project. Sounds like he wants to close-source it again and go commercial. Then he unilaterally announces that he is changing the plex86 license from LGPL to MIT because of “commercial and non-commerical inputs”. Nothing wrong with an alternative OSS funding model, but something about that approach doesn’t exhibit a real Open Source spirit. First he releases Bochs, but tells people they have to pay up if they want it released under an Open Source license. Kevin Lawton never seemed like a real Open Source advocate to me. Is Bochs back in active development? Has much happened since Kevin Lawton left to start plex86? The “Bochs 2.2.1” link in the article is broken. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |